Fighting climate change could benefit the economy


23747830545_55acd92324_h
The closing ceremony of COP21 in Paris featuring Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (second left); Christiana Figueres (left), Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); Laurent Fabius (second right), Minister for Foreign Affairs of France and President of the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP21) and François Hollande (right), President of France. (United Nations/flickr)
Jenna Ladd | January 13, 2017

A statement from the White House on Thursday outlined the relationship between climate change policy and economics.

The authors of the report, Senior Advisor Brian Deese and Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Jason Furman, point out that carbon pollution steadily decreased while the U.S. economy continued to improve from 2008-2015. During those years, carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. dropped by 9.5 percent while the economy grew by 10 percent.

These trends defy an old reality: increased carbon emissions means increased economic output.

Research from the International Energy Agency demonstrate that the same is true on an international scale. For example, although carbon dioxide emissions stayed the same in 2014 and 2015, the global economy grew.

The statement said that the international community took an important step in combating climate change when the Paris Agreement took effect in 2015. However, the report notes, “But Paris alone is not enough to avoid average global surface temperature increases that climate scientists say are very risky — additional policies that reduce CO2 emissions are needed, in the United States and elsewhere, to ensure that these damages are avoided.”

Failure to address climate change with meaningful policy is costly over time. The report expresses the estimated annual economic damages due to climate change as a fraction of the global gross domestic product from 2050 through 2100. “Climate damage cost” can be thought of as what all nations can expect to pay per year in terms of economic output due of the changing climate. These costs include sea level rise, illness and death related to heat, pollution, tropical diseases, and the effects of rising temperatures on agricultural productivity.

Climate Change Damage Estimates.png
Figure 1. Climate Change is Costly; Serious Climate Policy is a Bargain, The White House

Figure 1 does not include those effects of climate change that are difficult to quantify, such as the increasing  frequency and intensity of extreme weather. The statement said, “Failing to make investments in climate change mitigation could leave the global economy, and the U.S. economy, worse off in the future.”

The report ended with a warning:

“In deciding how much to reduce carbon pollution, and how quickly to act, countries must weigh the costs of policy action against estimates of avoided climate damages. But we should be clear-eyed about the fact that effective action is possible, and that the economic and fiscal costs of inaction are steep.”

On the Radio: Dubuque receives presidential honor for climate action


Downtown Dubuque, Iowa (SD Dirk / Flickr)
Downtown Dubuque, Iowa (SD Dirk / Flickr)
February 2, 2015

This week’s On the Radio segment looks at the environmental work of Dubuque, which was recently named a Climate Action Champion by the White House. Listen to the audio below, or continue reading for the transcript.

Transcript: Dubuque recognized by White House.

A city in Iowa was recently recognized by the White House for its efforts to address climate change.

This is the Iowa Environmental Focus.

Dubuque was named a Climate Action Champion by the White House for efforts the city has made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, aiming to have emissions 50 percent below 2003 levels by 2030. The city is also being rewarded for its flood conscious infrastructure and flood mitigation efforts.

Dubuque – which sits along the Mississippi River – has been declared a presidential disaster zone six times in the past 16 years. Next fall the city will begin a 179-million-dollar flood mitigation project to protect some of Dubuque’s most developed and flood susceptible areas.

As a Climate Action Champion, Dubuque will be eligible for federal funding and other resources for applicable projects.

For the full list of Climate Action Champions, visit Iowa-Environmental-Focus-dot-org.

From the UI Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, I’m Jerry Schnoor.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/12/03/fact-sheet-16-us-communities-recognized-climate-action-champions-leaders

Opinion: “The secret, dirty cost of Obama’s green power push”


Photo by Todd Ehlers; Flickr

(AP)- Dina Cappiello and Matt Apuzzo explore the issues behind the ethanol debate, and tackle controversial issues, with a focus on Iowa.

Follow this link to read the full article on Gazettnet.com. 

Iowa wind technician to sit in first lady’s box for State of the Union


Obama visits Iowa in 2003. Photo by TushyD, Flickr.
Obama visits Iowa in 2003. Photo by TushyD, Flickr.

Kirkwood Community College graduate Lee Maxwell will attend tonight’s State of the Union address beside first lady Michelle Obama and Jill Biden.

Maxwell is a graduate of Kirkwood’s wind energy technician program.

The White House released the following statement:

“In 2012, Lee Maxwell graduated from Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.  He gained twenty-six separate certifications in everything from reading blueprints to driving forklifts. Today, he’s responsible for turning on the power for new wind turbines that are being built all around the country. Kirkwood started its wind technician training program three years ago in partnership with Iowa-based Clipper Windpower, combining an industry-based curriculum and donated equipment to give students the hands-on experience they need to succeed.”

For more information, read the full article at The Des Moines Register.

House approves ban on farm dust limits


Photo by Guerito, Flickr.

The Iowa House of Representatives voted Thursday to approve a bill that would block federal regulations on dust associated with farms, mines and other rural activity.

Most Iowa farms do not exceed current federal emission limitations, but this bill would protect the state if the Environmental Protection Agency were to administer tougher regulations.

President Obama has threatened to veto the bill, and it is strongly opposed by Senate Democrats.

For more information, read the full story at the Des Moines Register.