Julia Poska| November 2, 2018
In light of upcoming midterm elections, Popular Science wants voters to be informed about science policy, even if campaigners are not. The national magazine recently released a list of each U.S. state’s most pressing science policy issue.
Unsurprisingly, Iowa’s biggest challenge is to reduce pollution from farms. Because intensive agriculture takes place on over two-thirds of Iowa’s land, nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous leak from the state’s ubiquitous farm fields into waterways at alarming rates.
The list cites a University of Iowa study from earlier this year, which found that Iowa’s nitrogen runoff into the Mississippi River rose 47 percent over the last five years. The Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy, initiated in 2013, aimed to reduce this rate 45 percent in that same time span.
Nutrient loss degrades soil quality for growers, and has created legal tensions between farmers and local waterworks. The loss creates issues far downstream as well. An overabundance of nutrients in the Gulf of Mexico has created a “dead zone” where low-oxygen conditions are inhospitable to aquatic life, which threatens the area’s fishing industry.
The Nutrient Reduction strategy pushes conservation practices like planting cover crops on otherwise bare fields, diversifying land use, and creating buffers along waterways out to farms, but adoption of such practices is still too low.
The next round of political leaders will need continue searching for a solution, something Iowa voters should take into consideration. As Popular Science wrote, “Even if it never surfaces on the campaign trail, science is always on the ballot.”